Those who know all
Let's review the following statements, conjectures, questions.
Pedraza is miserable. There were two opposing camps but one. Buenos Aires and Federal police forces are suspected by both the fact itself and for its history. Hooligan intervention rests on bullying look of the gang association. If one side was no confrontation, as noted by some media mob, but ambush. Railway Union should be responsible for the conduct of its framed, and all that is apparent from the business that implements. The outsourced companies are members of the guild, and therefore of the gang. The Government has a responsibility because it is exposed, in episodes as these, which manages or tolerate the unstable working conditions and trade unionists that encourage, promote confrontations via direct or indirect. It requires the intervention of the Union of Railways. The tragedy raised again how there is no progress in the democratization of association, because the workers are prisoners of unscrupulous employers and thugs. The companies involved, by the way, do not open their mouths. "A southpaw less," he was heard saying to one of the aggressors according to the testimony of a photographer Clarín. Some other scoundrels, or the same, they lie that became the historical classic right versus left radicalized Peronist trade union, as if left on weapons. How can it be that it took a shot (and another militant at the time of writing this column is between life and death) for the authorities to take strong commitment to reverse the dismissals and precarious? Notable but not unusual finding: the mainstream media discovered or amplified, abruptly, the taunts of job insecurity. And how can it be that the Government have escaped better control what their own miserable Pedraza said he was told, to announce that Wednesday would lefties? If your people would not intervene, what message? Or what is warned that his people did intervene to preclude cutting the tracks, as transpired in his first comments? The government tried to involve Duhalde. Moyano was dotted because the image is comparable to bullying, and just when it comes to make a show of force prokirchnerista, the splash reaches then the ruling. The hegemonic media will not hesitate to use it to affect the Government as it may, as it already does from business and negotiated that will hurt.
condensesThe above list is not all, probably, but most of the signals produced after the barbarism, from different sectors and interests. Do any of these statements and questions are formally incorrect? No. Do So are all acceptable, at least? Yes it must be given in order of importance? Sure, but what sets each according to its position and ideological and political horizon. And missing something? Yes and no: missing how meaning is constructed. On the one hand, this mode is involved in the order you want to be given to the components of the list. But on the other, there is no specific explicitness, but overlapping, what is at stake in this module are taken or seem contradictory because, alternatively, serve to challenge one and all. Should, therefore, resorted to an old friend, the dialectic, as a mechanism to (try to) resolve the contradictions. And as everyone knows, or should be known, the contradictions are divided into major and minor. What is the principal in this drama? That what we are attempting is the discourse that happened because it encourages a climate of confrontation. And what would encourage you not to? Would be enough of media law, and newsprint, and judge the oppressors, and project worker participation in corporate profits, and gay marriage, and children of Ernestina, and abortion trends and State meterete somewhat in their feasts. The list goes on, not much but still. When attacked by the atrocities and failures of the Government, be it the sultry Indek or privileges for business cronies, why not attack. Attack by what the fuck in the / structural symbols. And what the fuck is so huge, even though it is almost elementary in their eternal detriment immunities of class, if they have to use a murdered boy did not hesitate even a second. It is a cliché but very difficult to disprove aim: this government will fall over so well done, not by its real flaws. And the same barbarism proves Barracks: wonder why not repressed, under the revolting cynicism behind that question that requires a trigger-out against black as lazy or criminal court poke a hair or a street, while not a classless or that Tilinga out to defend the franchise of the field. So think, and hide it well built.
must say the obvious: the kid no one brings back to life. But in the name of being a social activist, should also be said that to avoid death as futile is not enough, not nearly with the discovery of his murderer material or their instigators. The militant kid standing firm against the conditions that lead to the bastards who killed him. And with regard to the most direct of his tragedy into a way of union representation and substitutes of mafia, thugs, mercenaries, bureaus, which are also a tragedy in force for democratic values. The national government the other bastards of dapper appearance reproached claim guilt for the murder, is charged with not complying with the identification of the killers. Has the obligation to eradicate gang crime union, which come from the depths of time and we all know, failing which would otherwise end up morally liquefy his speech and progressive skills. As the President said, some time ago that they wanted dead. However, just as there should be room for opportunistic sacrificial epic, left, or for gloating electoral and media big shots despicable opponents, right, should at least have to give excuses. We must end with which we all know. For the kid, so many others and in self defense, the end of the day. It sounds like rhetoric, a slogan of common sense, but perhaps you can say and, above all, expect anything else?
Pedrazas While there will be no peace, but the culture of violence, such violence is almost an Argentine cultural heritage. They are faced with militancy and persistent complaint. But the advanced, exemplary, beginning with the government. As the Government demonstrate how to depose a political vocation. If you have had and the decision not to punish, which is perhaps one of his achievements Preliminary precisely because it halted the death, you should write it takes the same willingness to get rid of the scourge which, by way of defending the ruling, but not least, they throw a dead man anyway.
